HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS
By: Ryan Lee
COMMENTS |
| 
Janet Jackson. Howard Dean. Paris Hilton. Tom Daschle.
The four disparate personalities share one common trait: They all were recently
recognized in high-profile ways by gay organizations.
For the gay groups that lauded them, including two national advocacy groups,
it’s a matter of honoring “brave though not perfect” political
leaders.
For critics, it’s an effort to “curry press and favor” without
any civil rights victories to show for it.
“How desperate can we get?” said Robin Tyler, a longtime gay rights
activist. “We’ve mistaken cultural visibility for civil rights.”
Tyler was specifically referencing the selection of ubiquitous pop culture
figure Paris Hilton and her mother, Kathy, as grand marshals for the Los Angeles
Gay Pride Parade on June 11.
But Pride organizers defended the choice.
Despite their previous lack of public advocacy for gay rights, the Hiltons
had “a genuine desire” to make a contribution to the gay civil rights
movement, which they did by simply leading the Pride parade through West Hollywood,
said Rodney Scott, president of Christopher Street West, the organizers of Pride
in Los Angeles.
“They felt they bring certain press and visibility, and they wanted
to lend their voices to our issues,” Scott said. “We are all looking
for the same thing, and that is to bring a greater awareness to our issues.
We just have different tactics for how to accomplish that.”
On June 18, the Human Rights Campaign dinner in Los Angeles honored singer Janet
Jackson with its Humanitarian Award, citing her financial contributions to AIDS
organizations.
While Jackson’s efforts are praiseworthy, calling her humanitarian of
the year is a stretch that could affect the value of future awards presented
by HRC, said Jim Key, chief public affairs officer for the Los Angeles Gay &
Lesbian Center.
“I think it’s appropriate to honor celebrities who are active
and involved in supporting our community, but I think it’s important what
you name that honor so that you don’t diminish that honor for future recipients,”
Key said.
He added that gay groups in Los Angeles are likely inspired by the city’s
star culture to court big-name celebrities for their functions. Big names draw
attendance as well, fulfilling the event’s goal of raising money for the
host group.
Gay rights organizations across the country are eager to attract well known
figures to big events, even if that sometimes means honoring someone who isn’t
fully supportive of gay civil rights, said Cheryl Jacques, a former president
of HRC.
“The reality is the fund-raising pressure for all of these organizations
to keep the doors open, the staff paid, the computers running, the e-mails going
out to keep our community informed is an extreme financial burden,” Jacques
said.
“From witnessing what some organizations do, if it’s a choice
between a big-name celebrity who probably will fill the seats, but who may not
be supportive of all our issues, they’ll beat out an unknown, hard-working
activist who won’t draw a crowd.”
But honoring celebrities and high-profile politicians simply to “curry
press and favor” has brought no rewards or civil rights victories to gay
organizations, said Andy Thayer, co-founder of the Chicago-based Gay Liberation
Network.
“I think it sends the message that our community is about fluff and
glitter, and not about civil rights, because if you flatter our egos by associating
with us, then that is good enough,” Thayer said. “It says something
about the lack of self esteem that our community has that we’re willing
to glom onto anyone with a big name who is willing to give us the time of day.”
Thayer was also critical of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force for
awarding Daschle, the former Senate minority leader, a Leadership Award in New
York City on June 13. The task force credits Daschle for risking his own re-election
to kill the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2004.
But throughout his unsuccessful re-election bid in 2004, Daschle qualified
his opposition to a federal constitutional ban on same-sex marriage by emphasizing
his support of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, and his belief that individual
states should be allowed to decide whether to recognize gay unions, Thayer said.
“He was running away from our ...
|