Re
“Gay
group
backs
Fauver
for
District
6”
(news,
Oct.
14):
Isn’t
it
strange
that
Steve
Brodie
claims
he
has
all
this
support
but
no
one
wants
to
give
him
any
money
for
his
campaign?
You
get
what
you
pay
for.
In
response
to
Steve
Brodie’s
comment
on
gay
bars
not
being
in
our
neighborhoods,
I
would
like
to
remind
him
that
the
bars
were
there
before
the
influx
of
straight
residents
looking
for
intown
living.
To
slam
Anne
Fauver
for
voting
to
diminish
nightlife
and
then
backtrack
on
his
earlier
statement
is
pathetic.
Re
“Endorsements
no
guarantee
for
gay
candidates”
(news,
Oct.
21):
Great
idea
to
cover
what
GLBT
endorsements
do
and
don’t
do
for
GLBT
candidates
and
incumbents.
When
both
Victory
Fund
and
Georgia
Equality
endorsed
Atlanta
City
Councilwoman
Anne
Fauver,
many
thought
the
race
was
over.
But
the
results
hinges
on
voter
turnout.
Gay
voters
are
great
at
demanding
actions
from
their
elected
officials,
but
we
turn
out
in
fewer
numbers
than
almost
any
other
group.
So,
what
exactly
does
a
Georgia
Equality
endorsement
get
an
openly
gay
candidate?
They
don’t
donate
a
lot
of
money,
because
they
don’t
have
any.
They
don’t
generate
a
lot
of
volunteers,
because
their
own
volunteer
events
are
sparsely
attended.
Re
“Gay
foster
kids
in
Ga.
difficult
to
place
in
homes”
(news,
Oct.
21):
People
need
to
grow
up
and
give
everyone
a
chance.
I
don’t
care
if
you’re
straight
as
an
arrow
or
like
people
of
the
same
sex,
everybody
deserves
to
have
a
family
and
be
loved.
Half
the
people
who
are
gay
were
born
that
way,
and
that’s
not
a
bad
thing.
Those
kids
deserve
love
and
a
family
to
care
for
them.
Re
“Atlanta’s
brand
touts
‘openness’”
(news,
Oct.
21):
Has
anyone
considered
that
the
road
to
achieving
equality
for
gay
men
and
women
may
be
shorter
if
we
deprive
the
city
of
gay
commerce?
We
have
been
spending
for
years,
yet
how
much
of
that
openness
and
opportunity
that
Mayor
Shirley
Franklin
is
touting
have
we
seen?
I
guess
“The
ATL”
sounds
better
than
“My
Lanta!”
Re
“Bi-national
couple
separated
by
politics”
(news,
Oct.
21):
This
couple
should
have
moved
to
Canada
in
the
first
place.
Neither
of
them
is
American.
What
rights
should
these
people
have
exactly?
It
is
not
a
marriage
issue;
it
is
immigration.
Time
for
some
gay
people
to
simply
grow
up
and
stop
believing
they
are
entitled
to
do
whatever
they
want.
A
straight
couple
could
have
avoided
all
of
these
dangers,
and
this
couple’s
horrible
experience,
with
a
simple
pair
of
“I
do’s.”
The
world
is
becoming
a
smaller
place
and
this
issue
will
only
get
bigger.
The
U.S.
is
already
behind
17
other
countries,
which
do
recognized
same-sex
couples
for
immigration.
Some
leader
of
the
free
world
we
are.
Re
“Out,
out
damn
celebs!”
(editorial
by
Kevin
Naff,
Oct.
21):
Maybe
people
like
Anderson
Cooper,
Shepard
Smith
and
Jodie
Foster
think
that
what
happens
in
their
bedroom
should
stay
in
their
bedroom.
It’s
no
one’s
business
what
they
do
in
their
private
time,
and
keeping
it
private
is
their
way
of
making
a
“statement.”
Much
as
I
despise
Fox
News,
it’s
pretty
despicable
to
out
Shepard
Smith.
The
audacity
of
Kevin
Naff
feeling
it’s
every
public
person’s
duty
to
state
clearly
and
for
the
record
their
sexual
preference
is
ridiculous.
What
gives
Naff
the
right
to
make
that
decision
for
every
other
gay
person?
I
am
so
happy
someone
finally
wrote
about
this
hypocrisy.
By
denying
or
“not
wanting
to
talk
about
it,”
a
celebrity
is
saying
there’s
something
wrong
with
being
gay.
I
am
all
for
privacy,
but
the
perfect
response
is,
“Yes
I
am,
and
I
am
also
very
private
about
my
personal
life.”
TV
anchors
and
reporters
who
stick
to
their
jobs
should
be
allowed
their
privacy.
But
celebrity-seeking
Anderson
Cooper
should
clearly
expect
such
scrutiny.
Thank
you,
thank
you,
Kevin
Naff.
It’s
a
disservice
to
every
gay
teenager
for
Anderson
Cooper
to
promote
the
idea
that
you
can’t
do
your
job
if
you
come
out.
I’m
sorry
if
he
is
still
afraid.
Is
this
Kevin
Naff’s
whole
deal,
being
gay?
Some
of
us
prefer
privacy
and
not
to
hide.
Some
of
us
would
prefer
not
to
be
defined
by
our
sexual
choices
or
to
lead
with
our
crotches.