Email:   Password:   login or create account
Business Directory
MOST VIEWED
Local:
A Beatle in Piedmont Park

National News:
Obama cheered at Pride celebration

Local:
Judge: Trans lawsuit against Ga. lawmakers can continue

National News:
Gay groups back suit against marriage ban

Feature:
Tough as nails

 
Miers opposed AIDS anti-bias laws in past campaign
Answers from Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers conflict so far

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Oct 21, 2005  |  By: EARTHA JANE MELZER  | COMMENTS |   |  

WASHINGTON — During her successful 1989 bid for Dallas City Council, Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers told a conservative group that she opposed legislation to protect people with AIDS and people “perceived to have AIDS” from discrimination.

On a survey circulated by the Dallas Eagle Forum—a chapter of the Eagle Forum, which was founded by anti-gay conservative Phyllis Schafly—Miers checked “No” in response to the question, “Would you support an ordinance that would force individual property owners and businesses to provide accommodations to persons with AIDS (acquired immune deficiency) and those perceived to have AIDS?”

The Dallas Eagle Forum questionnaire was among the batch of Miers’ personal documents delivered to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

Miers’ responses to the questions about AIDS came as a surprise to Louise Young, who took part in questioning Miers on her views on gay and lesbian issues as co-chair of the Lesbian/Gay Political Alliance of Dallas during the 1989 city council race.

Young, a longtime lesbian activist in Dallas, said that Miers responded differently to a candidate survey by the Lesbian/Gay Political Alliance and even participated in a forum sponsored by the group.

“She seemed uncomfortable,” Young said. “But she was polite.”

In a questionnaire from the gay group, Miers said she believed that gay men and lesbians should have the same civil rights as non-gay men and women. She also said that she opposed repealing the state’s sodomy law which criminalized gay sex exclusively; the law was overturned by the Supreme Court’s Lawrence vs. Texas decision in 2003.

When asked if she would support an ordinance to prohibit discrimination in housing and public accommodations based on HIV/AIDS status, and an ordinance to prohibit discrimination in employment based on AIDS/HIV status and several other categories, Miers answered more favorably than on the Eagle Forum questionnaire.

“I prefer a legislative solution to the issues raised by these questions,” she wrote in response. “I do not have all the facts on the significance of these ordinances, however, I am willing to discuss the need and make an appropriate decision when fully advised.”

Young said that Miers had a “mixed bag” of views on gay issues, and said she had been withholding judgment on her nomination to the Supreme Court.

But after learning of Miers’ statements to the Dallas Eagle Forum this week, Young said she is “pretty troubled” about the prospect of Miers serving as a Supreme Court justice.

The Americans with Disabilities Act, passed in 1990, one year after the Miers questionnaires, banned many types of discrimination against people with certain disabilities.

In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of Bragdon vs. Abbott that persons with HIV, even if they show no symptoms of full-blown AIDS, are protected by the ADA. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who Miers has been nominated to replace, dissented from the decision in a close 5-4 vote.

Reading tea leaves
Young said she was also concerned about Miers’ stance on abortion. During the 1989 city council race, Miers told a pro-life group that she would support a constitutional amendment banning abortions and that she would use her role as an elected official to advance the pro-life cause.

In meeting with senators last week, Miers gave mixed messages about her views on the right to privacy‑—‑the issue of privacy underpinned both the Roe vs. Wade decision that legalized abortion and Lawrence vs. Texas, which overturned sodomy laws.

As for the AIDS issue, Miers’ answers to the Dallas Eagle Forum are difficult to analyze because of the way the questions are phrased, said Michael Adams, director of education and public affairs for Lambda Legal.

“This is not the usual language that we use when talking about civil rights,” Adam said. “We should not be left to read the tea leaves in questionnaires like this.”

The Log Cabin Republicans also expressed concern over Miers’ responses to the Dallas Eagle Forum, and urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to question her on the matter.

Chris Crain contributed to this report.





  LOGIN      PASSWORD
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Spacer


SoVo
Spacer
© 2009 Window Media, LLC | User Agreement and Privacy Policy
PARTNERS Washington Blade | South Florida Blade | David Atlanta | The 411 Magazine | Bitch Session
Spacer