Email:   Password:   login or create account
Business Directory
MORE INFO
Jennifer Vanasco is a Chicago-based syndicated columnist and can be reached at vanasco@chicagofreepress.com.
MOST VIEWED
Local:
A Beatle in Piedmont Park

National News:
Obama cheered at Pride celebration

Local:
Judge: Trans lawsuit against Ga. lawmakers can continue

Feature:
Tough as nails

National News:
Gay groups back suit against marriage ban

 
Putting tolerance to the real test
If we won’t spend money at businesses like Curves gyms owned by anti-gay Christians, then we can’t complain about their boycotts.

HOME > VIEWPOINT > COLUMNS

Jun 11, 2004  |  By: Jennifer Vanasco  | COMMENTS |   |  

MY MOM LOVES Curves fitness centers for women. She loves working out at Curves so much, in fact, that she’s been talking about some day opening her own franchise.

It’s not hard to see why the world’s largest fitness chain appeals to women like my mom — women who’ve never been comfortable in traditional gyms because they’re uncomfortable with their bodies, or are older and don’t know how to use the equipment.

The program is easy to understand and follow. Women circle around from machine to machine, encouraging each other, jogging on rubber mats to keep up their heart rate while they’re waiting.

There are no mirrors to undercut the good feelings that come from exercising; there are no men leering at them from nearby equipment; there are no svelte 20-somethings running for hours on the treadmill without breaking a sweat.

I know a lot of lesbians who go to Curves and quite a few who own franchises.

But the recent controversy over the values of Gary Heavin, the entrepreneur behind Curves, has made what once would have been a matter of personal satisfaction for my mom into a moral dilemma.

And not just for my mom but for women all over who feel empowered by Curves’ pro-woman message and yet are dismayed to learn that Heavin is a pro-life, born again Christian who donates to anti-choice causes.

THE UPROAR STARTED in late April with a San Francisco Chronicle column that made a lot of allegations, some of which turned out to be untrue. Columnist Ruth Rosen wrote that the Curves founder had given $5 million to some of the most militant anti-abortion groups in the country directly from Curves’ annual gross revenues.

If that were the case, the decision would be easy. No self-respecting feminist would give money to a place that would only funnel it toward vicious anti-abortion groups like Operation Save America.

But that’s not what’s true, according to the online magazine Salon and a correction ran later in the Chronicle. Heavin actually supports three centers, the largest of which is a Catholic-run health care facility that provides services to many indigent, uninsured residents of central Texas.

None of the facilities he supports provides the option of abortion — but none of them actively advocates against abortion, either. And — this is important — Heavin supports them through his personal wealth, not through the company.

Heavin has not hidden his pro-life and anti-gay beliefs. He lets potential franchise owners know that the company is based on “biblical values,” though that’s not something pushed on to visitors to the gyms.

He told Today’s Christian, a magazine affiliated with Billy Graham’s Christianity Today, that, “there is nothing healthy about abortion.” In an op-ed in the Waco-Tribune Herald this year, he railed against Planned Parenthood, saying he didn’t want his 10-year-old daughter to be “taught masturbation and told that homosexuality is normal.”

THIS PUTS OUR backs up, doesn’t it? We get upset when we learn that people who own businesses where we spend our money are against those things we hold most dear.

We have always been quick to boycott. When we hear that Coors or Domino’s Pizza or Cracker Barrel is anti-gay or anti-choice or racist, we take our dollars elsewhere. And this is the right response if a company’s profits are going to a cause we don’t believe in.

But the hard question is whether feminists and good political lesbians should pull our funds from businesses just because the owner expresses personal beliefs that differ from our own?

After all, we wouldn’t want born again Christians to stop going to the local grocery store just because the owner was gay, marched in the Pride parade every year and gave a percentage of his own money to the Human Rights Campaign.

And Curves, despite its founder’s anti-woman politics, really is empowering to women. Besides helping them get healthier, the franchises are easy to run for first-time business owners and much less expensive than most. Having more women control their financial destiny can only be a good thing.

We can’t force people to change their beliefs. We can only encourage them to change their actions. And in Heavin’s case, I’m not sure his actions are worth changing.

I don’t know if my mom will buy that Curves franchise. She’s strongly pro-choice. But if she decided to, I guess I would support her. In this case, it’s her right to choose.





  LOGIN      PASSWORD
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Spacer


SoVo
Spacer
© 2009 Window Media, LLC | User Agreement and Privacy Policy
PARTNERS Washington Blade | South Florida Blade | David Atlanta | The 411 Magazine | Bitch Session
Spacer